4.6 Article

Degradation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Sulfide Solid-State Batteries by Conductive Interfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 127, Issue 39, Pages 19396-19405

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c05039

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The superionic solid-state argyrodite electrolyte Li6PS5Br can enhance the safety and energy density of lithium and lithium-ion batteries. However, this electrolyte still suffers from electrode degradation, and the stability of LFP against Li6PS5Br is not inherently guaranteed.
The superionic solid-state argyrodite electrolyte Li6PS5Br can improve lithium and lithium-ion batteries' safety and energy density. Despite many reports validating the conductivity of this electrolyte, it still suffers from passivating electrode degradation mechanisms. At first analysis, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) should be more thermodynamically stable in contact with sulfide electrolytes. However, without substantial improvements to interfacial engineering, we find that LFP is not inherently stable against Li6PS5Br. We hypothesize argyrodite oxidation favorably competes with LFP's delithiation, insulating the electrolyte-electrode interface and causing large overpotential losses. We show that compared to LiNixMnyCozO2, LFP has no actual electrochemical stability advantage despite operating at a lower voltage. We utilize tender energy XAS and XPS to show that chemical reactions occur between LFP and the Li6PS5Br solid electrolyte and these reactions are exacerbated by cycling. We also show that electrochemical degradation occurs at the interface between the solid electrolyte ion conductor and any electron conductor, namely, the active material and carbon additives. We further demonstrate that LiNbO3 cathode coatings on LFP can delay electrochemical degradation by electronically insulating the LFP-sulfide electrolyte interface but not prevent its occurrence at the carbon-electrolyte interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available