4.6 Article

Quantifying Aqueous Radiolytic Products in Liquid Phase Electron Microscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 127, Issue 31, Pages 15512-15522

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c02359

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liquid phase electron microscopy (LPEM) is important for studying chemical processes in situ, but the interaction between the liquid medium and the electron beam leads to radiolysis and the formation of reactive species that affect the studied processes. Current understanding of LPEM radiolysis is based on simulations using data collected at low electron flux intensities, requiring extrapolation to match the intensities used in LPEM. This study demonstrates a new approach to validate simulations by directly measuring radiolytic products during in situ LPEM.
Liquid phase electron microscopy (LPEM) is rapidly gainingimportancefor in situ studies of chemical processes. However, radiolysis dueto interactions between the liquid medium and the electron beam resultsin the formation of highly reactive species that influence the studiedprocesses. Our understanding of LPEM radiolysis is currently basedon simulations that rely on data collected from measurements at lowelectron flux intensities, requiring extrapolation by several ordersof magnitude to match the intensities utilized in LPEM. We demonstratedirect electrochemical measurements of radiolytic products duringin situ LPEM, which allows us to directly assess the high flux accuracyof low-flux radiolysis models. Using a specially designed liquid cellfor electrochemical detection, we quantify the primary expected stableradiolysis products H-2 and H2O2 ina scanning electron microscope. We find H-2 production israpid and in reasonable agreement with predictions, but H2O2 levels are lower than expected from the low-flux extrapolatedradiolysis models. This study demonstrates a new approach to experimentallyvalidate simulations and indicates that the chemical environment maybe far more reducing than predicted from current models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available