4.3 Review

Chewing performance of patients with worn dentition before and after restorations: A scoping review

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/joor.13549

Keywords

mastication; oral health; oral prostheses; oral rehabilitation; restorative dentistry; tooth wear

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This scoping review investigates the impact of restorative treatment on masticatory performance parameters for worn dentition. Only one article met the inclusion criteria, indicating that restorative treatment does not have an effect on masticatory performance test but can improve the self-report ability to chew.
BackgroundTooth wear is a multifactorial complex process related to the loss of dental tissue, due to chemical or mechanical processes, by abrasion, attrition, erosion. Restorative treatment represents an attempt to rebuild and recreate the lost structure. ObjectiveThis scoping review aims to investigate whether restorative treatment of worn dentition (either with direct or indirect adhesive composite adhesive procedures or with prosthetic techniques) can have an impact on the masticatory performance parameters. MethodsA scoping review was conducted on multiple databases (Pubmed, Medline CENTRAL, ICTRP), following the PRISMA guidelines. Abstracts of research papers were screened for suitability, and full-text articles were obtained for those who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. ResultsOnly one article meet the inclusion criteria of the review. Restorative treatment of worn dentition although have a positive impact on the self-report ability to chew, has no effect on the masticatory performance test. ConclusionAt the moment, not enough evidence to comment on the actual therapeutic role of restorative treatment on tooth wear is available. Clinicians, before taking any clinical decision, should carefully discuss with patients the needs and expectations of the treatment plan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available