4.2 Article

Comparison of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm and Copenhagen Index for the preoperative assessment of Japanese women with ovarian tumors

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Annual report of the Committee on Gynecologic Oncology, the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Annual Patient Report for 2018 and Annual Treatment Report for 2013

Satoru Nagase et al.

Summary: The study presents the annual patient report and treatment report for gynecological malignancies in Japan. The analysis of data from patients who started treatment in 2013 provided survival rates for cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer. The annual report is important for understanding the trends in gynecological malignancies in Japan.

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Comparison of HE4, CA125, ROMA and CPH-I for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Tumors

Nuria Carreras-Dieguez et al.

Summary: ROMA and CPH-I perform better than tumor markers alone in identifying patients with EOC or MCO. They can be helpful in assessing the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses, especially in cases where ultrasonographic diagnosis is challenging (stage I EOC, inconclusive diagnosis of malignancy by ultrasound features).

DIAGNOSTICS (2022)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Comparison of the Copenhagen Index versus ROMA for the preoperative assessment of women with ovarian tumors

Lubos Minar et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS (2018)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group

Dirk Timmerman et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2016)