4.5 Article

Scalable Detector Design for a High-Resolution Fast-Neutron Radiography Panel

Journal

JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-023-00999-x

Keywords

Fast Neutron Radiography; Proton Recoil Neutron Radiography; Neutron Counting; Neutron Radiography; Radiation Imaging; Silicon Photonics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of a scalable flat-panel neutron radiography device is crucial for meeting the nondestructive testing needs of the expanding industrial market. By using a specific detector and readout module, images from gamma and neutron sources were successfully generated, demonstrating high spatial resolution capabilities.
Development of a scalable flat-panel neutron radiography device is needed to meet the nondestructive testing needs of a growing industrial market. Flood field images from a Cs-137 gamma source and a Cf-252 fission neutron source were generated using a detector composed of a 3-mm-thick sheet of EJ-200, and 3-mm-thick sheet of acrylic light spreader, an 8 x 8 array of SensL MICROFJ-60035-TSV SiPMs, and an IDEAS ROSSPAD readout module. The readout module can be tiled together with similar systems to create a panel of any size, and is only limited by the number of available Ethernet ports in a switching system. A collimated gamma line image demonstrated a 90% spatial resolution of approximately 0.47 line pairs per centimeter and a 10% spatial resolution of approximately 2.32 line pairs per centimeter. A neutron edge image demonstrated a 90% spatial resolution of approximately 0.70 line pairs per centimeter and a 10% spatial resolution of approximately 3.35 line pairs per centimeter. Both of these images show the ability to generate radiographs with sub-SiPM spatial resolution. Using these readout modules, a large-scale radiographic panel can be developed by tiling ROSSPAD modules together.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available