4.4 Article

Performing a vibrotactile discrimination task modulates finger representations in primary somatosensory cortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages 1015-1027

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00428.2022

Keywords

primary somatosensory cortex; somatosensation; somatotopy; vibrotactile; working memory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that task demands modulate finger representations in the primary somatosensory cortex. This effect was observed not only during tactile stimulation but also during the delay period.
It is well established that vibrotactile stimuli are represented in somatotopic maps. However, less is known about whether these somatotopic representations are modulated by task demands and maybe even in the absence of tactile input. Here, we used a vibrotactile discrimination task as a tool to investigate these questions in further detail. Participants were required to actively perceive and process tactile stimuli in comparison to a no-task control condition where identical stimuli were passively perceived (no-memory condition). Importantly, both vibrotactile stimuli were either applied to the right index or little finger, allowing us to investigate whether cognitive task demands shape finger representations in primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Using multivoxel pattern analysis and representational similarity analysis, we found that S1 finger representations were more distinct during the memory than the no-memory condition. Interestingly, this effect was not only observed while tactile stimuli were presented but also during the delay period (i.e., in the absence of tactile stimulation). Our findings imply that when individuals are required to focus on tactile stimuli, retain them in their memory, and engage in active processing of distinctive stimulus features, this exerts a modulatory effect on the finger representations present in S1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available