4.5 Article

Long-term clinical outcomes of stereotactic radiotherapy for bilateral vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 164, Issue 3, Pages 587-595

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04430-3

Keywords

Neurofibromatosis type 2; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Stereotactic radiotherapy; Vestibular schwannoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of neurofibromatosis 2-related vestibular schwannoma patients treated with Robotic HSRT. The results showed excellent long-term tumor control with Robotic HSRT, but hearing preservation remains a major concern.
PurposeThe evidence for treating patients with neurofibromatosis 2-related vestibular schwannoma (VS-NF2) using hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT) is limited. This study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with VS-NF2 treated with Robotic HSRT.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 25 NF2 patients with 48 VSs who were treated using Robotic HSRT at Ramathibodi Hospital from January 2009 to January 2020.ResultsMedian follow-up was 98 months (range, 24-155 months). Median tumor volume was 2.3 cm3 (range, 0.4-28.3 cm3). Median prescribed dose was 18 Gy (range, 18-25 Gy) in three fractions (range, 3-5). The 5- and 10-year local control rates were 87% and 80%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year hearing preservation rates were 59% and 35%, respectively. Three patients developed new symptoms associated with transient volume expansion after treatment: hydrocephalus in one, facial weakness in one, and ataxia in one. No patient developed worsening of trigeminal nerve function. No histologically confirmed of radiation induced malignancy was reported in the study.ConclusionsRobotic HSRT demonstrated excellent long-term tumor control with a low non-auditory complication rate in patients with VS-NF2. However, preservation of hearing remains a major concern.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available