4.6 Article

Syntheses, characterization of Ni(II)/Zn(II) complexes derived from flexible tricarboxylate ligand and 2,2′-bipyridine and their methyl violet dye photodegradation applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
Volume 1287, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.135718

Keywords

Nickel(II); Zinc(II); Tricarboxylate ligand; Bipyridine; Dye; Photocatalysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three new complexes containing Ni(II) and Zn(II) metal centers were synthesized through a mixed ligand strategy. These complexes were used as photocatalysts for the photodegradation of methyl violet (MV) dye, and the results showed that complex 2 exhibited the best photocatalytic performance by degrading 92.8% of MV in 100 minutes. The photocatalytic degradation mechanism was proposed based on trapping experiments and density of states calculations.
Three new complexes comprising Ni(II) and Zn(II) metal centers having compositions [Zn2(HL)2(bpy)2(H2O)2] (1), [Ni(H2L)(bpy)(H2O)2(OH)] (2) and [Ni(H2L)2(bpy)2] (3) have been synthesized by adopting mixed ligand strategy using 4 & PRIME;-(3,4- dicarboxylphenyloxy) -4-biphenylcarboxylic acid (H3L) as main ligand and 2,2 & PRIME;-bipyridine (bpy) as co-ligand. These complexes have been characterized by microanalyses, FTIR and single crystal X-ray diffraction technique. The single crystal X-ray analyses reveal that all the three complexes have 2D supramolecular network constructed by hydrogen bonding interactions. These complexes have been employed as photocatalysts for the photodegradation of methyl violet (MV) dye. The photocatalytic experiments reveal that amongst all three complexes, the complex 2 exhibits best photocatalytic performance and degrades 92.8% of MV in time span of 100 min. The plausible photocatalytic degradation mechanism have been proposed with the help of trapping experiments and density of states calculations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available