4.7 Article

A bibliometric analysis for estimating the global research trends related to applications of ionic liquids in drug delivery

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
Volume 381, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.121778

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis; Cytotoxicity; Drug release; Drug delivery; Ionic liquids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article conducts a bibliometric analysis to assess the applicability of ionic liquids (ILs) in drug delivery. The study shows the continued use of ILs in drug delivery applications and suggests that further investigation is needed to advance drug delivery systems.
Many scientists are interested in ionic liquids (ILs) as they are efficient solvents, especially for drug delivery systems. A bibliometric analysis was performed in this article to assess the applicability of ILs in drug delivery. 519 publications from the Web of Science (WoS) database were analysed using VOSviewer and MS Excel. An analysis was conducted to identify publication trends, well-known authors, institutions, countries, sources, and the most cited articles in this field. This research comprised 1984 authors from 574 institutions and 52 countries. Regarding the total number of publications produced, Masahiro Goto, Muhammad Moniruzzaman, and Rie Wakabayashi were the most prolific authors. Based on the number of publications, the top three institutions were Kyushu University, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, and Shandong University. For the period from 2007 and 2021, the most productive countries were China, India, and the United States. In both the number of publications produced and the number of citations received, the Journal of Molecular Liquids has maintained its dominant position. This study demonstrated the continued use of ILs in drug delivery applications, indicating that more investigation might aid in advancing drug delivery systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available