4.7 Article

Evolutionary Engineering a Larger Porin Using a Loop-to-Hairpin Mechanism

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 435, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168292

Keywords

outer membrane proteins; b-barrel; loop-to-hairpin; molecular evolution; neisserial porin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In protein evolution, diversification is often driven by genetic duplication. However, a computational study suggests that another evolutionary mechanism involving a transition from loops to hairpins can lead to an increase in the number of strands in outer membrane proteins.
In protein evolution, diversification is generally driven by genetic duplication. The hallmarks of this mech-anism are visible in the repeating topology of various proteins. In outer membrane (3-barrels, duplication is visible with (3-hairpins as the repeating unit of the barrel. In contrast to the overall use of duplication in diversification, a computational study hypothesized evolutionary mechanisms other than hairpin duplica-tions leading to increases in the number of strands in outer membrane (3-barrels. Specifically, the topology of some 16-and 18-stranded (3-barrels appear to have evolved through a loop to (3-hairpin transition. Here we test this novel evolutionary mechanism by creating a chimeric protein from an 18-stranded (3-barrel and an evolutionarily related 16-stranded (3-barrel. The chimeric combination of the two was created by replacing loop L3 of the 16-stranded barrel with the sequentially matched transmembrane (3-hairpin region of the 18-stranded barrel. We find the resulting chimeric protein is stable and has characteristics of increased strand number. This study provides the first experimental evidence supporting the evolution through a loop to (3-hairpin transition.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://crea-tivecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available