4.2 Article

The growth factor midkine may play a pathophysiological role in rheumatoid arthritis

Journal

MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 54-59

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2016.1179860

Keywords

Chemokine; Cytokine; Disease activity; Midkine; Rheumatoid arthritis

Categories

Funding

  1. Cellmid Ltd.
  2. Toho University School of Medicine [26-25, 27-12]
  3. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science Technology
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23591449]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23591449] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Midkine (MK) is involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and survival. In this study, we measured serum MK levels in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and investigated the correlation of serum MK with RA disease activity. Expression and effect of MK in RA synovial tissue were also examined. Methods: Serum MK and production of inflammatory mediators by rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts (RSFs) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. MK expression in synovial tissue was examined by immunohistochemistry. MK receptor expression was analyzed by RT-PCR and Western blotting. Results: RA patients had a significantly higher serum MK level than healthy controls. In RA patients, the MK level was correlated with DAS28-ESR, disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire, and rheumatoid factor level. The serum MK level tended to be decreased by anti-TNF therapy. MK was expressed by synovial lining cells in RA synovial tissues and it enhanced the production of IL-6, IL-8, and CCL2 by RSFs. RSFs expressed LDL receptor-related protein 1, candidate receptor for MK. Conclusions: The serum MK level could be a marker of disease activity in RA and an indicator of a poor prognosis. MK may have a role in the pathogenesis of RA via induction of inflammatory mediators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available