4.7 Review

New-onset and relapsed thrombotic microangiopathy post-COVID-19 vaccination

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28946

Keywords

atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; COVID-19; thrombotic microangiopathy; thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; vaccination

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) associated with COVID-19 vaccination, particularly mRNA vaccines, is characterized by different clinical presentations such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Females tend to develop TTP symptoms after the first vaccine dose, while males are more likely to experience them after the second dose. TTP patients commonly receive plasma exchange (PEX)-based treatment, whereas aHUS patients often undergo non-PEX therapies.
Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been reported, however, the clinical characteristics and pathogenesis remained mysterious. We reviewed 84 TMA cases post-COVID-19 vaccination, including 64 patients diagnosed with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), 17 cases presented as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), and three cases manifested as unclassified TMA. TMA episodes were mostly associated with messenger RNA vaccines. For TTP, 67.6% of females developed symptoms after the first dose of the vaccine, and 63.0% of males were secondary to the second dose (p = 0.015). Compared with TTP, aHUS generally appeared within 7 days (p = 0.002) and showed higher levels of serum creatinine (p < 0.001). 87.5% of TTP received plasma exchange (PEX)-based treatment, and 52.9% of aHUS adopted non-PEX-based therapies (p < 0.001). Mechanistically, complement dysfunction, neutrophil activation, and the generation of pathogenic autoantibodies resulting from molecular mimicry contribute to explaining the pathogenesis of TMA post-COVID-19 vaccination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available