☆ 4.7 Review

Comparison of Reporting and Transparency in Published Protocols and Publications in Umbrella Reviews: Scoping Review

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2023)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Strengthening the quality of clinical trials of acupuncture: a guideline protocol

Ying He et al.

Summary: This article discusses the problems of insufficient and low-quality evidence in acupuncture clinical trials and aims to develop a guideline to strengthen the quality of these trials. The methodology involves searching for relevant studies, evaluating the quality of acupuncture clinical trials, and developing a comprehensive quality control system.

BMJ OPEN (2022)

Add to Collection

Review Clinical Neurology

Effectiveness of interventions to prevent falls for people with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and stroke: an umbrella review

Nicola O'Malley et al.

Summary: The study found that exercise-based interventions are effective at reducing falls in Parkinson's Disease, but the evidence for Multiple Sclerosis and stroke is less conclusive. Despite differences, exercise-based interventions remain a feasible approach for addressing modifiable physiological falls risk factors for people with these neurological conditions.

BMC NEUROLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Letter Health Care Sciences & Services

Language restrictions in systematic reviews should not be imposed in the search strategy but in the eligibility criteria if necessary

Dawid Pieper et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Inconsistency and low transparency were found between core outcome set protocol and full text publication: a comparative study

Ming Liu et al.

Summary: This study revealed numerous inconsistencies between protocols and full-text publications in the development of core outcome sets (COSs), especially in terms of study types, databases searched, Delphi surveys, and face-to-face consensus meetings. Transparency regarding any changes to the methods is crucial in developing COSs.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Inconsistencies in study eligibility criteria are common between non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their protocols registered in PROSPERO

Kaiyan Hu et al.

Summary: The majority of systematic reviews exhibit differences in study eligibility criteria, with many changes occurring in at least two key components, yet these changes are rarely explained. Results show that outcomes have the highest variation, while comparators have the lowest. Authors, the PROSPERO platform, peer-review journals, and reviewers should work towards improving transparency.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Health outcomes of smoking during pregnancy and the postpartum period: an umbrella review

Tuba Saygin Avsar et al.

Summary: This umbrella review analyzed the impact of maternal smoking during pregnancy on 46 health conditions of infants. It found an increased risk for sudden infant death syndrome, asthma, and other conditions. The study also identified gaps in the literature regarding dose-response association, exposure window, and postnatal smoking.

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page et al.

Summary: The PRISMA statement was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report the purpose, methods, and findings of their reviews. The updated PRISMA 2020 statement includes new reporting guidance, a 27-item checklist, an abstract checklist, and revised flow diagrams for reviews.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Surgery

Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Luigi Marano et al.

Summary: The umbrella review compared robotic gastrectomy (RG) and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in terms of outcomes and found that while RG has advantages like shorter time to oral intake, less intraoperative bleeding, and longer operation time, there are also drawbacks such as longer operation time and inferior blood loss. Caution is needed in interpreting the results of each surgical technique, especially in meta-analyses with large heterogeneity.

UPDATES IN SURGERY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Ethics

Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices

Evan Mayo-Wilson et al.

Summary: The study outlines a process for assessing journal policies, procedures, and practices according to open science standards, providing new rating instruments. It aims to analyze influential journals publishing social intervention research to determine their alignment with open science standards. Through this demonstration, refinements to the TOP Guidelines and the TOP Factor are expected to be identified for continuous improvement.

RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Biochemical Research Methods

How peer review and publication can make a good protocol even better

Matthew J. Pavlovich et al.

Summary: The guiding principle of STAR Protocols is to make researchers' lives easier by publishing robust and usable protocols, leveraging peer review to help authors improve their protocol. This process highlights the value of peer review and the collaborative peer review philosophy at STAR Protocols specifically.

STAR PROTOCOLS (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study

Kaethe Goossen et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2020)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

The State of Evidence in Patient Portals: Umbrella Review

Marcy G. Antonio et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2020)

Add to Collection

Review Critical Care Medicine

Low-Value Clinical Practices in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: An Umbrella Review

Lynne Moore et al.

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA (2020)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review

Michelle Gates et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them

Stefania Papatheodorou

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Going upstream - an umbrella review of the macroeconomic determinants of health and health inequalities

Yannish Naik et al.

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH (2019)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Differences between protocols for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews

Dawid Pieper et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

The prevalence of and factors associated with inclusion of non-English language studies in Campbell systematic reviews: a survey and meta-epidemiological study

Lauge Neimann Rasmussen et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2018)

Add to Collection

Review Psychiatry

Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews

Paolo Fusar-Poli et al.

EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

Beverley J. Shea et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

Beverley J. Shea et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Mathematical & Computational Biology

Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist

Madeleine Ballard et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Psychology, Biological

A manifesto for reproducible science

Marcus R. Munafo et al.

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

ClinicalTrials.gov and Drugs@FDA: A Comparison of Results Reporting for New Drug Approval Trials

Lisa M. Schwartz et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2016)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A third of systematic reviews changed or did not specify the primary outcome: a PROSPERO register study

Andrea C. Tricco et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature

Shareen A. Iqbal et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension

John Rathbone et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

Larissa Shamseer et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

Larissa Shamseer et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Nursing

Constructing a Search Strategy and Searching for Evidence

Edoardo Aromataris et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING (2014)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview

Dawid Pieper et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research

E. Miguel et al.

SCIENCE (2014)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions

Matthew J. Page et al.

COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Political Science

Fishing, Commitment, and Communication: A Proposal for Comprehensive Nonbinding Research Registration

Macartan Humphreys et al.

POLITICAL ANALYSIS (2013)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

Gordon Guyatt et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials

Kerry Dwan et al.

COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2011)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses

John P. A. Ioannidis

CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2009)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

David Moher et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Why most published research findings are false

JPA Ioannidis

PLOS MEDICINE (2005)

Add to Collection

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis

PR Williamson et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2005)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Publishing Protocols of systematic reviews - Comparing what was done to what was planned

CA Silagy et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.