4.3 Article

Comparison of paclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin versus paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/03000605231200267

Keywords

Ovarian cancer; chemotherapy; paclitaxel liposome; carboplatin; biochemical marker; adverse event

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the efficacy of paclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. The results showed that paclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin had a higher overall response rate and could reduce serum marker levels and the occurrence of adverse reactions.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of paclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer and assess their effects on serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), CA125, CA199, matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), MMP-7, and MMP-9 levels.MethodsIn this observational study, 102 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were assigned to receive paclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin (Group A) or paclitaxel combined with carboplatin (Group B). Clinical efficacy; serum HE4, CA125, CA199, MMP-2, MMP-7, and MMP-9 levels; and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the groups.ResultsThe overall response rate was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B. After chemotherapy, serum HE4, CA125, CA199, MMP-2, MMP-7, and MMP-9 levels were lower in Group A than in Group B. The incidence of myalgia, dyspnea, nausea and vomiting, facial flushing, peripheral neuropathy, and skin rash was lower in Group A than in Group B.ConclusionPaclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin displayed better efficacy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer than paclitaxel combined with carboplatin, which might be attributable to reductions in serum marker levels and the occurrence of adverse events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available