4.2 Article

Risk evaluation of carbapenem-induced liver injury based on machine learning analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 660-666

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.03.007

Keywords

Carbapenem; Meropenem; Doripenem; Machine learning; Decision tree analysis; Flowchart

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the rate of liver injury between meropenem and doripenem and constructed a decision tree model to predict carbapenem-induced liver injury. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the risk of liver injury between meropenem and doripenem. The decision tree model based on ALT and ALBI score can be useful for assessing liver injury before doripenem administration.
Introduction: Information regarding carbapenem-induced liver injury is limited, and the rate of liver injury caused by meropenem (MEPM) and doripenem (DRPM) remains unknown. Decision tree (DT) analysis, a machine learning method, has a flowchart-like model where users can easily predict the risk of liver injury. Thus, we aimed to compare the rate of liver injury between MEPM and DRPM and construct a flowchart that can be used to predict carbapenem-induced liver injury.Methods: We investigated patients treated with MEPM (n = 310) or DRPM (n = 320) and confirmed liver injury as the primary outcome. We used a chi-square automatic interaction detection algorithm to construct DT models. The dependent variable was set as liver injury from a carbapenem (MEPM or DRPM), and factors including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, and concomitant use of acetaminophen were used as explanatory variables.Results: The rates of liver injury were 22.9% (71/310) and 17.5% (56/320) in the MEPM and DRPM groups, respectively; no significant differences in the rate were observed (95% confidence interval: 0.710-1.017). Although the DT model of MEPM could not be constructed, DT analysis showed that the incidence of introducing DRPM in patients with ALT >22 IU/L and ALBI scores > -1.87 might be high-risk.Conclusions: The risk of developing liver injury did not differ significantly between the MEPM and DRPM groups. Since ALT and ALBI score are evaluated in clinical settings, this DT model is convenient and potentially useful for medical staff in assessing liver injury before DRPM administration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available