4.5 Article

Deep learning model on rates of change for multi-step ahead streamflow forecasting

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2023.001

Keywords

artificial intelligence; neural network; rates of change; streamflow forecasting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water security and urban flooding are major sustainability concerns, and this study introduces a novel method of using rates of change in artificial intelligence models for predicting floods. The LSTM model outperformed the MLP model and showed significant improvement in forecast accuracy.
Water security and urban flooding have become major sustainability issues. This paper presents a novel method to introduce rates of change as the state-of-the-art approach in artificial intelligence model development for sustainability agenda. Multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and deep learning long short-term memory (LSTM) models were considered for flood forecasting. Historical rainfall data from 2008 to 2021 at 11 telemetry stations were obtained to predict flow at the confluence between Klang River and Ampang River. The initial results of MLP yielded poor performance beneath normal expectations, which was R = 0.4465, MAE = 3.7135, NSE = 0.1994 and RMSE = 8.8556. Meanwhile, the LSTM model generated a 45% improvement in its R-value up to 0.9055. Detailed investigations found that the redundancy of data input that yielded multiple target values had distorted the model performance. Q(t) was introduced into input parameters to solve this issue, while Q(t+0.5) was the target value. A significant improvement in the results was detected with R = 0.9359, MAE = 0.7722, NSE = 0.8756 and RMSE = 3.4911. When the rates of change were employed, an impressive improvement was seen for the plot of actual vs. forecasted flow. Findings showed that the rates of change could reduce forecast errors and were helpful as an additional layer of early flood detection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available