4.7 Article

Bio-sorbent from castor oil polyurethane foam containing cellulose-halloysite nanocomposite for removal of manganese, nickel and cobalt ions from water

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 454, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131433

Keywords

Bio-based polyurethane; cellulose-halloysite; nanocomposite; Manganese NICKEL AND COBALt removal; Wastewater treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to mitigate water contamination caused by mining dam failures in Brazil, eco-friendly bio-based castor oil polyurethane foams containing a cellulose-halloysite green nanocomposite were prepared. The efficiency, capacity, and kinetics of adsorption for manganese, nickel, and cobalt ions at pH= 2 and pH= 6.5 were investigated. The results showed a significant increase in adsorption capacity and efficiency for the polyurethane foams containing the nanocomposite compared to the control foam.
In order to mitigate the contamination of water with heavy metals, caused by mining dam failures in Brumadinho and Mariana in Brazil, eco-friendly bio-based castor oil polyurethane foams, containing a cellulose-halloysite green nanocomposite were prepared. Polyurethane foams containing none (PUF-0), 5%wt (PUF-5), and 10% wt (PUF-10) of the nanocomposite were obtained. The application of the material in aqueous media was verified through an investigation of the efficiency of adsorption, the adsorption capacity, and the adsorption kinetics in pH= 2 and pH= 6.5 for manganese, nickel, and cobalt ions. An increase of 5.47 times in manganese adsorption capacity was found after only 30 min in contact with a solution having this ion at pH= 6.5 for PUF-5 and 11.38 times for PUF-10 when both were compared with PUF-0. Adsorption efficiency was respectively 68.17% at pH= 2 for PUF-5% and 100% for PUF-10 after 120 h, while for the control foam, PUF-0, the adsorption efficiency was only 6.90%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available