4.6 Article

Inpatient Hepatitis C Treatment Coordination and Initiation for Patients Who Inject Drugs

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08386-y

Keywords

hepatitis C; injection drug use; hospitalization; substance use

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to improve retention in hepatitis C (HCV) care among hospitalized people who inject drugs (PWID). The program, which included e-consultation-prompted care coordination and outpatient telehealth for HCV treatment, achieved favorable outcomes for hospitalized PWID.
BackgroundWith hepatitis C (HCV) incidence rising due to injection drug use, people who inject drugs (PWID) are a priority population for direct-acting antivirals (DAA). However, significant barriers exist. At our institution, hospitalized PWID were screened for HCV but not effectively linked to care.AimTo improve retention in HCV care among hospitalized PWID.SettingQuaternary academic center in the Southeast US from August 2021 through August 2022.ParticipantsHospitalized PWID with HCV.Program DescriptionE-consultation-prompted care coordination and HCV treatment with outpatient telehealth.Program EvaluationCare cascades were constructed to assess retention and HCV treatment, with the primary outcome defined as DAA completion or sustained virologic response after week 4. Of 28 patients, 11 started DAAs inpatient, 8 initiated outpatient, and 9 were lost to follow-up or transferred care. Overall, 82% were linked to care and 52% completed treatment. For inpatient initiators, 73% achieved the outcome. Of non-inpatient initiators, 71% were linked to care, 53% started treatment, and 36% achieved the outcome.DiscussionInpatient HCV treatment coordination, including DAA initiation, and telehealth follow-up, was feasible and highly effective for hospitalized PWID. Future steps should address barriers to inpatient DAA treatment and expand this model to other similar patient populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available