A Qualitative Assessment to Inform Strategic Improvement of Research and Development within the USDA Forest Service

Past reviews of the USDA Forest Service (USFS) Research and Development (R & D) branch have identified several persistent challenges, including unclear strategic direction and a need for greater communication with end users. We conducted research focused on the Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) of R & D to understand current perceptions about the station's efficacy and strategic direction as well as its engagement with partners both inside and outside of USFS. We conducted fifty-eight interviews with USFS and RMRS leaders, scientists, and partners. Interviewees said national research priorities are unclear, and there is tension between conducting basic and applied science. Nonscientist partners said they depend on RMRS for scientific expertise. Interviewees recommended clarifying research priorities, improving leadership and communication both inside and outside of the agency, investing more in science communication, and strengthening incentives to conduct applied research. These station-level results provide insight into improvements that could be made to enhance R & D's ability to pursue its mission. Study Implications: The USDA Forest Service provides actionable science to foresters, land managers, and other stakeholders through its Research and Development (R & D) branch. Recent administrative studies of this branch have highlighted some mission-critical challenges that must be overcome for R & D to fulfill its mission. This study provides new information about the effectiveness, collaboration, and communication of the Rocky Mountain Research Station to provide a high-resolution assessment that can be used to inform the strategic improvement of R & D and improve science delivery to stakeholders.

Automated summary

Past reviews have identified challenges in the USDA Forest Service (USFS) Research and Development (R & D) branch, including unclear strategic direction and a need for better communication with end users. Research focused on the Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) of R & D to understand its efficacy, strategic direction, and engagement with partners. Interviews revealed that national research priorities are unclear and there is tension between basic and applied science. Recommendations include clarifying priorities, improving leadership and communication, investing more in science communication, and strengthening incentives for applied research.