4.3 Article

The impact of lipid degradation on fingerprint quality on fired firearm cartridges

Journal

JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages 1713-1720

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.15342

Keywords

ammunition; derivatization; fingerprint; lipids; shell; squalene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recovering identifiable fingerprints from fired cartridge cases is challenging. Chemical modifications and their effects on fingerprint integrity after firing were investigated in this study. Primary fingerprint lipids were extracted from fired and unfired cartridge cases and quantified using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Most lipids showed similar concentrations in fired and unfired cases, except for squalene which had a 28% lower recovery rate in fired cases.
The recovery of identifiable fingerprints from fired cartridge cases is challenging. Therefore, the characterization of chemical modifications and their effects on fingerprint integrity post-firing is essential. In this study, the primary fingerprint lipids, including myristic acid, pentadecanoic acid, palmitoleic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, squalene, and cholesterol in fired and unfired cartridges, were extracted with acetonitrile, followed by derivatization using N,O-Bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide with 1% trimethylchlorosilane (BSTFA/1%TMCS). Squalane was used as the internal standard, and all quantifications were performed using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry using a triple-quadrupole mass filter. All lipids identified in the unfired cartridges were also detected in the fired cartridges, and statistical analysis using Student's t-test and F tests was performed with a 95% confidence level. The concentration of lipids in the unfired cartridges was found to be similar to that detected in the fired cartridges, except for squalene, the recovery of which was 28% lower in the fired cartridges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available