4.4 Article

Development of an Improved Steamer for Optimum Retention of Carotenoids in Attiéké Produced from Biofortified Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Roots

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESSING AND PRESERVATION
Volume 2023, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2023/6653897

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research aimed to develop a more efficient steamer to produce high-quality Attieke from biofortified cassava roots, in order to minimize carotenoid degradation. The results showed that the developed steamer outperformed the traditional steamer in terms of cooking speed, fuel consumption, and true carotenoid retention.
Attieke, made from biofortified (yellow) cassava genotypes, requires a new cooking method to minimize carotenoid degradation during processing. Thus, this research is aimed at designing and building a more efficient steamer to produce high-quality attieke from biofortified cassava roots. Using three improved biofortified cassava genotypes (IBA141092, IBA070593, and IBA011368) obtained from IITA research farms, attieke samples were produced using traditional and developed steamers. The results show that the developed steamer outperformed the traditional steamer; it was 1.5 times faster, used less fuel (2.6 times less), and had higher true carotenoid retention. The developed steamer genotype IBA070593 had the highest true retention of 90.4 percent, while the traditional steamer genotype IBA0141092 had the lowest carotenoid retention of 61.9 percent and the highest in the developed steamer (62.4 percent). When compared to the traditional steamer, the developed steamer had better cooking performance and a more extraordinary ability to retain carotenoids. Thus, the developed steamer is recommended for attieke processors due to its improved cooking performance, and using this steamer to produce attieke from biofortified cassava will help to alleviate vitamin A deficiency among attieke consumers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available