4.2 Article

Sex-specific trait architecture in a spider with sexual size dimorphism

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14217

Keywords

maternal effects; quantitative genetics; sexual conflict; sexual-size dimorphism; trait architecture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sexual dimorphism may evolve under antagonistic selection, where different optimal traits for the sexes are favored. Sexual-size dimorphism (SSD) is often assumed to indicate the resolution of sexual conflict, but the decoupling of trait architecture between sexes remains largely unknown. We tested the architecture of body size in the African hermit spider and found that the genetic and maternal effects on body size differed between sexes, suggesting a sex-specific architecture that allows for independent body-size evolution.
Sexual dimorphism, or sex-specific trait expression, may evolve when selection favours different optima for the same trait between sexes, that is, under antagonistic selection. Intra-locus sexual conflict exists when the sexually dimorphic trait under antagonistic selection is based on genes shared between sexes. A common assumption is that the presence of sexual-size dimorphism (SSD) indicates that sexual conflict has been, at least partly, resolved via decoupling of the trait architecture between sexes. However, whether and how decoupling of the trait architecture between sexes has been realized often remains unknown. We tested for differences in architecture of adult body size between sexes in a species with extreme SSD, the African hermit spider (Nephilingis cruentata), where adult female body size greatly exceeds that of males. Specifically, we estimated the sex-specific importance of genetic and maternal effects on adult body size among individuals that we laboratory-reared for up to eight generations. Quantitative genetic model estimates indicated that size variation in females is to a larger extent explained by direct genetic effects than by maternal effects, but in males to a larger extent by maternal than by genetic effects. We conclude that this sex-specific body-size architecture enables body-size evolution to proceed much more independently than under a common architecture to both sexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available