4.2 Article

Learning from the early careers of master clinicians

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jep.13906

Keywords

clinical excellence; life-long learning; master clinicians; medical education; professional development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studying the early career activities of master clinicians can provide insights for medical trainees and early career clinicians. It was found that master clinicians adopted certain activities more commonly than their peers, such as reading about patients' conditions, reading case reports, engaging in teaching, and spending less time on research.
BackgroundMaster clinicians are recognized as multidimensional experts in clinical medicine. Studying their formative clinical activities could generate insights to guide medical trainees and early career clinicians. ObjectivesTo investigate which early career activities were adopted more commonly by master clinicians than their matched peers and to characterize master clinicians' early career activities across institutions and specialties. Subjects and MethodsWe surveyed master clinicians at seven medical centres about their early career activities. For master clinicians in the Department of Medicine (DOM), we also surveyed matched internist peers. ResultsOf 150 master clinician respondents, 65% were internists (DOM); 35% practiced in other specialties. Compared to their internist peers, there was a trend toward internist master clinicians reading more about their patients' conditions (6.0 vs. 4.8 h per week), reading more case reports (4.0 vs. 2.1 per month), engaging in more frequent teaching duties and devoting less time to research. ConclusionsThe early career activities identified in this study can be adopted by clinicians pursuing clinical excellence and promoted by training programs that seek to foster life-long learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available