Do government intervention measures promote e-waste recycling in China?

To improve the low e-waste recycling rate, the Chinese government has introduced a series of intervention measures. However, the effectiveness of government intervention measures is controversial. This paper con-structs a system dynamics model to study the impact of Chinese government intervention measures on e-waste recycling from a holistic perspective. Our results demonstrate that the current Chinese government intervention measures do not promote e-waste recycling. By studying the adjustment strategies of government intervention measures, it can be found that the most effective adjustment strategy is to increase government policy support while increasing the punishments for recyclers. If the government only adjusts a kind of intervention measures, it is better to increase punishments than to increase incentives. And increasing the punishment for recyclers is more effective than increasing the punishment for collectors. If the government chooses to increase incentives, then the government should only increase policy support. This is because increasing the subsidy support is ineffective.

Automated summary

In order to improve the low e-waste recycling rate, the Chinese government has implemented a series of intervention measures. However, the effectiveness of these measures is controversial. This study constructs a system dynamics model to investigate the impact of Chinese government intervention measures on e-waste recycling from a holistic perspective. The findings suggest that the current intervention measures do not effectively promote e-waste recycling. The most effective adjustment strategy is to increase government policy support while strengthening punishments for recyclers.