4.4 Article

Prospective Randomized Trial of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Duration for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Low-Risk Patients

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Multidisciplinary Sciences

Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Hae Do Jung et al.

Summary: The meta-analysis results of this study showed that a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics can be effective for PCNL, but extended-dose antibiotics may be required for high-risk patients to reduce post-PCNL infection-related complications.

PLOS ONE (2022)

Article Urology & Nephrology

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Moderate to High Infectious Risk Population: A Report from the EDGE Consortium

Roger L. Sur et al.

Summary: The study compared the effectiveness of 2-day versus 7-day preoperative antibiotics in moderate to high risk patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Results showed that 7 days of antibiotics reduced the risk of sepsis compared to 2 days, with no significant differences in nonseptic bacteriuria, stone-free rate, and length of stay. Future guidelines for antibiotic recommendations in percutaneous nephrolithotomy should consider stratifying patients based on infectious risk.

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2021)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Enhanced Antibiotic Treatment Based on Positive Urine Dipstick Infection Test Before Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Did Not Prevent Postoperative Infection in Patients with Negative Urine Culture

Peng Xu et al.

Summary: Preoperative antibiotics based on positive urine dipstick infection tests were not effective in reducing the rate of positive stone culture, but were associated with higher incidence of SIRS after PCNL in patients with negative urine cultures.

JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY (2021)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Predictors of post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy sepsis: The Northern Malaysian experience

Khai Yeong Teh et al.

Summary: This study aimed to identify the incidence of post-PCNL sepsis and perioperative characteristics associated with increased rates of sepsis. Positive preoperative urine cultures, presence of Staghorn calculi, and multiple PCNL punctures were found to predict higher risks of postoperative sepsis. Diabetes mellitus and preoperative stenting were not associated with a greater risk of post-PCNL sepsis. At-risk patients should be identified preoperatively, receive aggressive perioperative antibiotic treatment, and be closely monitored for septic complications during the convalescence period.

UROLOGY ANNALS (2021)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Best Practice Statement on Urologic Procedures and Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Deborah J. Lightner et al.

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2020)

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Impact Factors and an Efficient Nomogram for Predicting the Occurrence of Sepsis after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Jun Wang et al.

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL (2020)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Epidemiology of stone disease across the world

Igor Sorokin et al.

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Risk factors for fever and sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Aso Omer Rashid et al.

ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)

Editorial Material Pharmacology & Pharmacy

Clinical, economic and societal impact of antibiotic resistance

Steven L. Barriere

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY (2015)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Prevalence of Kidney Stones in the United States

Charles D. Scales et al.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2012)

Review Infectious Diseases

Antimicrobial stewardship: bridging the gap between quality care and cost

Debra A. Goff

CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES (2011)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Factors Affecting Fever Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Clinical Study

Murat Gonen et al.

JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY (2008)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Maurice Stephan Michel et al.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2007)