4.4 Article

Treatment of functional dyspepsia in Chinese adult patients with domperidone: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13237

Keywords

domperidone; functional dyspepsia; Nepean dyspepsia index; postprandial distress syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of domperidone in the treatment of Chinese patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) who were diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria, including identification of FD subtypes that potentially respond better to domperidone. Among the 160 patients enrolled, domperidone showed a positive pattern regarding overall treatment effect (OTE) response rate after 2-week therapy compared to placebo in patients with FD as well as those with FD subtypes of postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and overlapping PDS-epigastric pain syndrome (EPS). No new safety issues were observed.
ObjectiveThis pilot study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of domperidone for the treatment of Chinese patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) who were diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria and to identify the FD subtypes that potentially responded better to domperidone.MethodsThis multicenter prospective study was conducted in China from August 2018 to July 2020, consisting of a 1-week screening phase and a 2-week double-blind treatment phase. Participants were randomized to receive domperidone 10 mg or matching placebo tablets thrice daily for 14 days. The primary end-point was the overall treatment effect (OTE) response rate after 2-week therapy.ResultsAltogether 160 patients were included, with 80 patients in each group. The OTE response rate after 2-week therapy was significantly higher for domperidone compared with placebo (60.7% vs 46.0%; relative risk [RR] 1.318, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.972-1.787). Moreover, the OTE response rate after 2-week domperidone or placebo treatment was 60.3% versus 54.9% for postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) (RR 1.098, 95% CI 0.750-1.607) and 60.6% versus 35.2% for overlapping PDS-epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) (RR 1.722, 95% CI 0.995-2.980). Adverse events were reported by seven patients in the domperidone group and 12 patients in the placebo group. None of the adverse events in the domperidone group were serious.ConclusionDomperidone showed a positive pattern regarding OTE response rates after 2-week therapy compared to placebo in patients with FD, as well as in subtypes of PDS and overlapping PDS-EPS. No new safety issue was observed. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of domperidone in the treatment of Chinese patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) who were diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria, including identification of FD subtypes that potentially respond better to domperidone. Among the 160 patients enrolled, domperidone showed a positive pattern regarding overall treatment effect (OTE) response rate after 2-week therapy compared to placebo in patients with FD as well as those with FD subtypes of postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and overlapping PDS-epigastric pain syndrome (EPS). No new safety issues were observed.image

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available