4.7 Article

Whey protein peptides PEW and LLW synergistically ameliorate hyperuricemia and modulate gut microbiota in potassium oxonate and hypoxanthine-induced hyperuricemic rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
Volume 106, Issue 11, Pages 7367-7381

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2023-23369

Keywords

peptide; hyperuricemia; uric acid synthesis; uric acid transporters; gut microbiota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of Pro-Glu-Trp (PEW) and Leu-Leu-Trp (LLW) has been found to alleviate hyperuricemia (HUA) and kidney injury. This is achieved by reducing uric acid levels, improving renal oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage, and modulating gut microbiota composition.
Pro-Glu-Trp (PEW) and Leu-Leu-Trp (LLW) are peptides derived from whey protein digestive products; both peptides exhibit xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity in vitro. However, it remains unclear whether these peptides can alleviate hyperuricemia (HUA) in vivo. In this study, we investigated the roles of PEW and LLW, both individually and in combination, in alleviating HUA induced by potassium oxonate and hypoxanthine. Together, PEW and LLW exhibited synergistic effects in reducing the serum levels of uric acid (UA), creati-nine, and blood urea nitrogen, as well as increasing the fractional excretion of UA. The combined treatment with PEW and LLW inhibited UA synthesis, promoted UA excretion, and restored renal oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Moreover, the combined treatment alleviated dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, characterized by increased helpful microbial abundance, decreased harmful bacterial abundance, and increased production of short-chain fatty acids. Taken together, these results indicate that the combination of PEW and LLW mitigate HUA and kidney injury by rebalancing UA synthesis and excretion, modulating gut microbiota composition, and improving oxidative stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available