4.5 Article

Remodelling of mandibular condylar head after fixation of fractures with ultrasound activated resorbable pins: A retrospective case series

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 51, Issue 7-8, Pages 460-466

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2023.07.004

Keywords

Condylar head fracture; Resorbable fixation; Remodelling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study retrospectively reviewed the use of poly-lactic acid pins for condylar head fracture fixation and found that the resorption process did not adversely affect remodelling of the condylar head. The position, shape, and bone changes of the condyle compared favorably with conservative management or fixation with titanium screws.
The aim of this study was to assess whether the resorption of poly-lactic acid pins, used for condylar head fracture fixation, adversely affect remodelling of the condylar head. A retrospective review of patients was performed that underwent ORIF of CHF with ultrasound activated resorbable poly-lactic acid pins and had CT/CBCT scans of the condyle at least 18 months after surgery, at which point the fixation material was expected to be resorbed. We reviewed the size, shape and position of the condylar head and compared this to the normal side and compared this to the results of conservative management and ORIF with titanium screws in the literature. Most patients had condylar heads normally positioned and shaped, with minimal bone changes. The position of the condyle in the fossa, its shape and bone changes compare favourably with previous studies on CHF managed conservatively or with titanium screw fixation. There was no radiographic evidence of the pins after 18 months. In conclusion, ultrasound activated resorbable pins can provide suitable fixation for ORIF of condylar head fractures, avoiding the need for screw removal, and there was no evidence that the resorption process adversely affected the remodelling of the condylar head.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available