4.6 Article

Present and future constraints on secluded dark matter in the Galactic Halo with TeV Gamma-ray observatories

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/07/043

Keywords

dark matter experiments; gamma ray experiments; dark matter simulations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By studying the annihilation of secluded dark matter in the Galactic Halo, we find that TeV gamma-ray instruments in the Southern Hemisphere, namely H.E.S.S., CTA, and SWGO, have restrictive bounds on the annihilation cross-section and complement each other in different annihilation channels.
The dark matter relic density may be governed by the presence of new mediators that connect the dark matter field with the Standard Model particles. When the dark matter particle mass is larger than the mediator's, the pair production of mediators is kinematically open. This setup is known in the literature as secluded dark matter. Motivated by the appearance of secluded dark matter in several model building endeavours, we investigate the sensitivity of TeV gamma-ray instruments in the Southern Hemisphere namely, H.E.S.S., CTA, and SWGO to secluded dark matter annihilating in the Galactic Halo. We exploit the complementarity aspects of these detectors to find restrictive bounds on the annihilation cross-section for different annihilation channels. In particular, for a dark matter particle mass of 2TeV, H.E.S.S. is able to constraint >= 4 x 10(-26) cm(3) s(-1) at 95% confidence level for the 4q and 4 tau channel, while CTA will be sensitive to >= 7 x 10(-27) cm(3) s(-1) and SWGO >= 6 x 10(-27) cm(3) s(-1) for the 4 tau channel, both well below the thermal relic cross-section. In fact, the combination of CTA and SWGO will be able to probe cross-sections below the thermal relic value for dark matter particles in the whole mass range between 100 GeV and 100TeV in the 4q and 4 tau channels, and between 100 GeV and similar to 40TeV in the 4b channel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available