4.5 Article

Revision of ASCE 8-Design of cold-formed stainless steel structural members

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.107986

Keywords

Cold-formed stainless steel; Austenitic; Ferritic; Duplex; Structural design; Continuous strength; Direct strength

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ASCE Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel Structural Members has been updated to ASCE 8-22 after significant advancements in research knowledge and design standards. The new version includes improved design expressions and offers multiple design approaches. It provides provisions for slender austenitic, ferritic, and duplex cold-formed stainless steel structural members and their connections, diverging from carbon cold-formed steel and stainless structural steel standards.
The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel Structural Members was last updated in 2002 and significant advancements in research knowledge and companion design standards have occurred in the intervening 20 years. A dedicated group of volunteers re-formed the ASCE 8 specification committee and over the course of four years completely revamped the standard. The new version, ASCE 8-22, still parallels the cold-formed carbon steel standard AISI S100, and has improved and simplified design expressions for members and connections. Both the Continuous Strength Method and the Direct Strength Method are provided in ASCE 8-22, along with traditional effective width design approaches. The standard provides a robust set of provisions for slender austenitic, ferritic, and duplex cold-formed stainless steel structural members and their connections. This paper overviews major changes in the ASCE 8-22 standard highlighting areas of divergence from carbon cold-formed steel (AISI S100) and from stainless structural steel (AISC 370-21).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available