4.6 Article

Methodology reporting improved over time in 176,469 randomized controlled trials

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials

Johanna A. Damen et al.

Summary: This study explores indicators of questionable research practices in randomized controlled trials, including bias risk, selective reporting bias, sample size, and statistical discrepancy. The findings suggest that more recent publication year, trial registration, mentioning of reporting standards, and higher journal impact factor are associated with a lower risk of questionable research practices.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomized trials

Daniela R. Junqueira et al.

Summary: Randomized controlled trials are important for evaluating interventions in healthcare research, and reporting both benefits and harms is crucial. The CONSORT Harms 2022 checklist is introduced to improve the reporting of harms in randomized controlled trials. Thirteen items were modified and three new items were added to the CONSORT checklist to enhance the reporting of harms.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Reminding Peer Reviewers of Reporting Guideline Items to Improve Completeness in Published Articles: Primary Results of 2 Randomized Trials

Benjamin Speich et al.

Summary: Studies have shown that adherence to reporting guidelines is suboptimal. By asking peer reviewers to check specific reporting guideline items, this study aimed to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in published articles. However, the results of two randomized trials did not support the effectiveness of this intervention.

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Peer Reviewed Evaluation of Registered End-Points of Randomised Trials (the PRE-REPORT study): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial

Christopher W. Jones et al.

Summary: The objective of this study was to test whether providing relevant clinical trial registry information to peer reviewers would decrease discrepancies between registered and published trial outcomes. The results showed that the tested intervention did not increase agreement between prospectively registered and published trial outcomes. Therefore, other approaches are needed to improve the quality of outcome reporting in clinical trials.

BMJ OPEN (2022)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Evaluation of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in patients with COVID-19 using the CONSORT statement

Yuhuan Yin et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the reporting quality of RCTs for COVID-19 patients, finding that the overall adherence score was influenced by journal impact factor and endorsement of the CONSORT statement. Despite numerous RCTs being published, the suboptimal reporting quality highlights the need for stricter adherence to CONSORT guidelines and improvement in detailed reporting.

PLOS ONE (2021)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Toward assessing clinical trial publications for reporting transparency

Halil Kilicoglu et al.

Summary: The objective of the study was to annotate RCT publications with CONSORT checklist items and develop text mining methods. Different annotation methods were used to annotate and analyze a corpus containing 10,709 sentences, demonstrating the performance of various methods in recognizing methodology-related items.

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS (2021)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement

Christiaan H. Vinkers et al.

Summary: The likelihood of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has decreased over the past decades as trial registration and CONSORT Statement reporting have increased. However, relatively high probabilities of bias still remain, particularly in journals with lower impact factors, emphasizing the continued need for improvement in RCT registration, conduct, and reporting.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2021)

Article Biochemical Research Methods

BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining

Jinhyuk Lee et al.

BIOINFORMATICS (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

CONSORT endorsement improves the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials in dentistry

Rafael Sarkis-Onofre et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Trialstreamer: A living, automatically updated database of clinical trial reports

Iain J. Marshall et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION (2020)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Checklist checked

[Anonymous]

NATURE (2018)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials

Iain J. Marshall et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION (2016)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature

Shareen A. Iqbal et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement

Sunita Vohra et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement

Sunita Vohra et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)

Review Medicine, Research & Experimental

Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: A systematic review

Lawrence Mbuagbaw et al.

CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2014)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Active implementation strategy of CONSORT adherence by a dental specialty journal improved randomized clinical trial reporting

Nikolaos Pandis et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)

Review Surgery

Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review of reporting quality

Riaz Ahmed Agha et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY (2014)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research

Story C. Landis et al.

NATURE (2012)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials

Marion K. Campbell et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2012)

Article Medical Informatics

ExaCT: automatic extraction of clinical trial characteristics from journal publications

Svetlana Kiritchenko et al.

BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING (2010)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Kenneth F. Schulz et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

David Moher et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts

Sally Hopewell et al.

LANCET (2008)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement

Robert L. Kane et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)