4.6 Review

Increasing FDA-accelerated approval of single-arm trials in oncology (1992 to 2020)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages 151-158

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.04.001

Keywords

US food and drug administration; Antineoplastic agents; Accelerated approval; Historical controls; Drug approval; Government regulation; Legis-lation; Drug

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to analyze the characteristics of single-arm trials (SAT), evaluate the transparency in presenting historical control by the FDA, and assess confirmatory randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The findings showed that 47% of FDA-AA approvals were based on SAT, with 52% of treatments converting into regular approval and 46% based on confirmatory RCTs using overall survival (OS) as an outcome. Improved transparency in reporting historical controls is necessary.
Objectives: We aimed to map the characteristics of single-arm trials (SAT), report the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) transparency in presenting historical control, and to assess the confirmatory randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Study Design and Setting: This metaresearch included a review of all oncology indication approved using SAT by FDA-AA (FDAd Accelerated Approval) from 1992 to 2020. Two independent reviewers identified SAT, extracted data from FDA full medical reviews for historical controls reported and MEDLINE for searching for confirmatory RCT published. Results: Of 254 FDA-AA approvals, 119 (47%) were approved for oncologic indications using SAT. Fifty-four drugs for 72 oncology indications were for leukemia, lymphoma, lung cancer, urothelial cancer, multiple myeloma, and thyroid cancer. Overall, 37 (52%) treatments were converted into regular approval. Of these, 17 (46%) were based on confirmatory RCTs using overall survival (OS) as an outcome. Five indications were withdrawn from the market. Most trials outcomes were blindly assessed by independent research committees. Median trial sample size was 105 patients (min:8 to max:532). The FDA did not fully specify historical control selection in 75% of cases. Conclusion: The granting of FDA-AAs based on SAT in oncology is increasing with more target drugs approved over time. Transparency in historical control reporting is necessary. & COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available