4.7 Article

Production of purified H2, heat and biochar from wood: Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of small scale units

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 412, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137347

Keywords

Gasification; Pyrolysis; Hydrogen; Biochar; Reforming

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the production of purified H2, heat and biochar from woodchips through pyrogasification processes. Techno-economic and life cycle assessments were conducted, and it was found that the market prices of hydrogen, heat, and biochar were not sufficient for profitability. The environmental benefits of pyrogasification processes were evaluated, showing advantages in terms of global warming and fossil fuel consumption potentials, but disadvantages in acidification potential and photochemical oxidant formation compared to SMR.
Hydrogen is forecasted to contribute to the energy transition. This study evaluates the production of purified H2, heat and biochar from woodchips. Three pyrogasification processes are compared: gasification (O2/H2O) with or without catalytic reforming and water gas-shift, autothermal pyrolysis. Techno-economic and life cycle assess-ments were conducted based on detailed mass and energy balances. On the economic front, the historical market prices of hydrogen, heat and biochar are not sufficient to reach profitability. The subsidies required to reach profitability and the avoided CO2 emissions from reference steam methane reforming (SMR) process were evaluated. It is estimated between 130 and 310euro/tCO2 avoided which can be reduced with higher price of hydrogen. On the environmental front, the pyrogasification processes are more attractive than SMR regarding global warming, ozone depletion layer and fossil fuel consumption potentials. Meanwhile, the acidification potential and the photochemical oxidant formation are higher than SMR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available