4.6 Article

Asymmetrical Flow Field Flow Fractionation for Molar Mass Characterization of Polyethylene Oxide in Abuse-Deterrent Formulations

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1705, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464186

Keywords

Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation; high molar mass polyethylene oxide; abuse deterrent formulation; molar mass distribution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) method was used to characterize high molar mass polyethylene oxide (HM-PEO) and it was found that PEO is sensitive to thermal stress, with decreased molar mass after heat exposure.
High molar mass polyethylene oxide (HM-PEO) is commonly used to enhance the mechanical strength of solid oral opioid drug products to deter abuse. Because the properties of PEO depend on molar mass dis-tribution, accurately determining the molar mass distribution is a necessary part of understanding PEO's role in abuse-deterrent formulations (ADF). In this study, an asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) analytical procedure was developed to characterize PEO polymers with nominal molar masses of 1, 4 or 7 MDa as well as those from in-house prepared placebo ADF. The placebo ADF were manufactured using direct compress or hot-melt-extrusion methods, and subjected to physical manipulation, such as heating and grinding before measurement by AF4 were performed. The molar mass distribution charac-terized by AF4 revealed that PEO was sensitive to thermal stress, exhibiting decreased molar mass with increased heat exposure. The optimized AF4 method was deemed suitable for characterizing HM-PEO, of-fering adequate dynamic separation range for PEO with molar mass from 100 kDa to approximately 10 MDa. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available