4.6 Article

Algorithm for tracking peaks amongst numerous datasets in comprehensive two-dimensional chromatography to enhance data analysis and interpretation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1705, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464223

Keywords

Method optimization; Data interpretation; Peak tracking, LCxLC-MS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a peak-tracking algorithm for comparing data in one-dimensional and two-dimensional chromatography. Two application strategies were investigated: simultaneous processing of all chromatograms and cumulative processing for method optimization. The accuracy and efficiency varied in different applications.
Analytical data processing often requires the comparison of data, i.e. finding similarities and differences within separations. In this context, a peak-tracking algorithm was developed to compare multiple datasets in onedimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) chromatography. Two application strategies were investigated: i) data processing where all chromatograms are produced in one sequence and processed simultaneously, and ii) method optimization where chromatograms are produced and processed cumulatively. The first strategy was tested on data from comprehensive 2D liquid chromatography and comprehensive 2D gas chromatography separations of academic and industrial samples of varying compound classes (monoclonal-antibody digest, wine volatiles, polymer granulate headspace, and mayonnaise). Peaks were tracked in up to 29 chromatograms at once, but this could be upscaled when necessary. However, the peak-tracking algorithm performed less accurate for trace analytes, since, peaks that are difficult to detect are also difficult to track. The second strategy was tested with 1D liquid chromatography separations, that were optimized using automated method-development. The strategy for method optimization was quicker to detect peaks that were still poorly separated in earlier chromatograms compared to assigning a target chromatogram, to which all other chromatograms are compared. Rendering it a useful tool for automated method optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available