4.5 Article

Flipping the Thinking on Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion. Why EDI Is Essential for the Development and Progression of the Chemical Sciences: A Case Study Approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
Volume 100, Issue 11, Pages 4279-4286

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00364

Keywords

Elementary/Middle School Science; High School; First-Year Undergraduate; Second-Year Undergraduate; Upper-Division Undergraduate; Graduate Education; Curriculum/Outreach; Analogies/Transfer; Inclusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores how interactions with diverse groups in the Chemical Sciences field, including visually impaired adults, Australian First Peoples, primary school learners, and South African communities, have altered perspectives on both teaching and research. The case studies demonstrate the immense value these diverse groups bring to our understanding about how to learn, as well as their contributions to new perspectives on solving chemical problems.
All learners have a contribution to make to the development of the Chemical Sciences, be that in novel ways to teach, and their perspectives and contexts, but also in research, both in chemical education and the wider Chemical Sciences. Through four case studies, this paper explores interactions with diverse groups and how this has altered perspectives on both teaching and research. The case studies include work with visually impaired adults, a project bringing together First Peoples in Australia with academics to explore old ways (traditional science) and new ways (modern approaches), primary (elementary) school perspectives on teaching science, and a project in South Africa to connect university and township communities. Not only do these case studies demonstrate the immense value these diverse groups bring to our understanding about how to learn, but they also bring new perspectives on how to view and solve chemical problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available