☆ 4.6 Article

Patient-Relevant Outcomes Following First Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty, by Diagnosis An Analysis of Implant Survivorship, Mortality, Serious Medical Complications, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Utilizing the National Joint Registry Data Set

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2023)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Rheumatology

The STAR care pathway for patients with pain at 3 months after total knee replacement: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial

Vikki Wylde et al.

Summary: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a new care pathway for chronic pain after total knee replacement. The results of the randomized controlled trial showed that patients in the intervention group, who received the new care pathway, had improved pain outcomes at 12 months compared to those who received usual care alone. Furthermore, the intervention was also cost-effective, providing greater improvement at a lower cost.

LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Minimal important changes and differences were estimated for Oxford hip and knee scores following primary and revision arthroplasty

Shiraz A. Sabah et al.

Summary: This study estimated the clinically meaningful changes and differences for the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS/OKS) using distribution and anchor-based methods. The estimates can be used for sample size calculations and interpreting changes in joint function and differences between groups.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Progression of chronic pain and associated health-related quality of life and healthcare resource use over 5 years after total knee replacement: evidence from a cohort study

Sophie Cole et al.

Summary: In this study on total knee replacement patients, it was found that chronic pain is present in a significant percentage of cases, leading to worse pain, function, and quality of life. Patients with chronic pain also had higher healthcare resource use and costs, predominantly from hospital readmissions. While most patients experienced recovery over time, a substantial portion continues to have chronic pain, highlighting the need for better identification and support for these individuals.

BMJ OPEN (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Early patient-reported outcomes from primary hip and knee arthroplasty have improved over the past seven years

Shiraz A. Sabah et al.

Bone & Joint Journal (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Serious adverse event rates and reoperation after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: population based cohort study

Jonathan L. Rees et al.

Summary: This study found that the risks of serious adverse events associated with common shoulder arthroscopic procedures are relatively low. However, serious complications do occur, including the risk of reoperation within one year.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

No exponential rise in revision knee replacement surgery over the past 15 years: an analysis from the National Joint Registry

S. A. Sabah et al.

Summary: This study investigates the trends in incidence rate and indications for revision knee replacement (rKR) in the UK over the past 15 years. The study reveals that the total number and incidence rate of rKR procedures have been increasing, but the rate of increase has been slowing down. Aseptic loosening used to be the most frequent indication for rKR, but its prevalence has decreased in recent years, while infection has become the most common indication. Infection is also prevalent in re-revision KR procedures.

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Implementing large-scale data quality validation in a national arthroplasty registry to improve compliance

C. Boulton et al.

Summary: High-quality data is crucial for interpreting registry information. The National Joint Registry (NJR) implemented a formal data quality (DQ) audit process to validate and correct errors in the dataset, resulting in improved compliance rates and reduced burden on hospitals.

BONE & JOINT OPEN (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Rheumatology

How long do revised and multiply revised knee replacements last? A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry

Kevin Deere et al.

Summary: This study investigated the risk of multiple knee replacement revisions in males and younger patients, as well as the increasing risk of further revision with each procedure. The duration of each subsequent revision was found to be approximately half of the previous one, indicating progressively decreased success with successive revisions.

LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Patient-reported outcome measures following revision knee replacement: a review of PROM instrument utilisation and measurement properties using the COSMIN checklist

Shiraz A. Sabah et al.

Summary: This study aimed to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for evaluating symptoms, health status, or quality of life following revision knee joint replacement, and validated joint-specific PROMs. The findings showed that the quality of PROM development and validation studies for joint-specific PROMs is inadequate, with future research needed to strengthen the evidence on their measurement properties.

BMJ OPEN (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Differences in mortality and complication rates following revision knee arthroplasty performed for urgent versus elective indications

S. G. F. Abram et al.

Summary: The study compared the rates of serious adverse events in patients undergoing revision knee arthroplasty with different indications, finding that patients undergoing revision surgery for urgent indications (infection or fracture) had higher mortality and risk of other adverse events.

BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Patient-Reported Function and Quality of Life After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 10,727 Patients from the NHS PROMs Program

Shiraz A. Sabah et al.

Summary: The study found that two-thirds of patients experienced a meaningful improvement in joint function after revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), but there was a high frequency of patient-reported complications.

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Financial analysis of revision knee surgery at a tertiary referral centre as classified according to the Revision Knee Complexity Classification (RKCC)

M. J. Petrie et al.

Summary: In a review of 188 rTKA procedures over two years, it was found that complexity of revision and infected revisions significantly increased length of stay and cost. All groups incurred a mean deficit, but this increased significantly with revision complexity and for infected revisions. The total deficit to the Trust for the rTKA service over two years was £667,091.

KNEE (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision knee arthroplasty EVALUATION OF THE OXFORD KNEE SCORE USING A UK NATIONAL PROMS DATASET

S. A. Sabah et al.

Summary: The study concludes that the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a useful and valid instrument for assessing outcomes following revision knee arthroplasty. The OKS is responsive to change and demonstrates good measurement properties, without significant floor or ceiling effects.

BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Increases in the rates of primary and revision knee replacement are reducing: a 15-year registry study across 3 continents

Peter L. Lewis et al.

ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2020)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up

Jonathan T. Evans et al.

LANCET (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis

Hannah A. Wilson et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With Increased Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Relative to Noninfectious Revisions

Venkat Boddapati et al.

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Adverse outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a study of 700 000 procedures in the national Hospital Episode Statistics database for England

Simon G. F. Abram et al.

LANCET (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study

Lee E. Bayliss et al.

LANCET (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Are all metal-on-metal hip revision operations contributing to the National Joint Registry implant survival curves? A STUDY COMPARING THE LONDON IMPLANT RETRIEVAL CENTRE AND NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY DATASETS

S. A. Sabah et al.

BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2016)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement

Eric I. Benchimol et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Financial analysis of revision knee surgery based on NHS tariffs and hospital costs DOES IT PAY TO PROVIDE A REVISION SERVICE?

R. F. Kallala et al.

BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Validation of primary metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties on the National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland using data from the London Implant Retrieval Centre

S. A. Sabah et al.

BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Reason for Revision Influences Early Patient Outcomes After Aseptic Knee Revision

Paul Baker et al.

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2012)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.