An investigation of how specimen dimensions affect biaxial mechanical characterizations with CellScale BioTester and constitutive modeling of porcine tricuspid valve leaflets

Biaxial mechanical characterizations are the accepted approach to determine the mechanical response of many biological soft tissues. Although several computational and experimental studies have examined how experimental factors (e.g., clamped vs. suture mounting) affect the acquired tissue mechanical behavior, little is known about the role of specimen dimensions in data acquisition and the subsequent modeling. In this study, we combined our established mechanical characterization framework with an iterative size -reduction protocol to test the hypothesis that specimen dimensions affect the observed mechanical behavior of biaxial characterizations. Our findings indicated that there were non-significant differences in the peak equibiaxial stretches of tricuspid valve leaflets across four specimen dimensions ranging from 4.5 x 4.5 mm to 9 x 9 mm. Further analyses revealed that there were significant differences in the low-tensile modulus of the circumferential tissue direction. These differences resulted in significantly different constitutive model parameters for the Tong-Fung model between different specimen dimensions of the posterior and septal leaflets. Overall, our findings demonstrate that specimen dimensions play an important role in experimental characterizations, but not necessarily in constitutive modeling of soft tissue mechanical behavior during biaxial testing with the commercial CellScale BioTester.

Automated summary

This study investigates the impact of specimen dimensions on the mechanical behavior of biaxial characterizations. The results show that there are no significant differences in peak equibiaxial stretches across different specimen dimensions, but significant differences exist in the low-tensile modulus of the circumferential tissue direction.