4.5 Article

Comparative Effects of Two Different Doses of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Wound Healing Third-Degree Burns in Rats

Journal

MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE
Volume 79, Issue 4, Pages 313-320

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22632

Keywords

burns; wound healing; low-level laser therapy

Funding

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Education (CAPES)
  2. Research and Education Center for Photo Therapy in Health Science (NUPEN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Burns are injuries caused by direct or indirect contact to chemical, physical, or biological agents. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a promising treatment since it is low-cost, non-invasive, and induces cell proliferation. This study aimed to investigate the effects of LLLT (660 nm) at two different fluences (12.5 J/cm(2) and 25 J/cm(2)) per point of application on third-degree burns in rats. Thirty rats (Wistar) divided into GC, GL12.5, and GL25 were used in the study, and submitted to burn injury through a soldering iron at 150 degrees C, pressed on their back for 10 s. LLLT was applied immediately, and 2, 4, 6, and 8 days after wound induction. Histological analysis revealed a decreased inflammatory infiltrate in the group treated with 25 J/cm(2), and intense inflammatory infiltrate in the control group and in the group treated with 12.5 J/cm(2). The immunostaining of COX-2 was more intense in the control groups and in the group treated with 12.5 J/cm(2) than in the group treated with 25 J/cm(2). Conversely, VEGF immunomarking was more expressive in the group treated with 25 J/cm(2) than it was in the other two groups. Therefore, our findings suggest that the use of 25 J/cm(2) and 1 J of energy was more effective in stimulating the cellular processes involved in tissue repair on third-degree burns in rats by reducing the inflammatory phase, and stimulating angiogenesis, thus restoring the local microcirculation which is essential for cell migration. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available