4.2 Article

Reliability and validity of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale for adults with asthma

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASTHMA
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2234990

Keywords

Validity and reliability; asthma; activities of daily living; dyspnea; >

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to validate the London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) scale for assessing dyspnea during activities of daily living (ADL) in adults with asthma. The results showed that the LCADL scale has moderate convergent validity with other related tests and good internal consistency. Therefore, the LCADL scale can effectively evaluate dyspnea in adults with asthma during their daily activities.
IntroductionDyspnea during activities of daily living (ADL) is frequently reported by adults with asthma. However, instruments that specifically assess that in people with asthma have not yet been validated.ObjectivesTo investigate the validity and reliability, including standard error of measurement (SEM) and Minimum Detectable Change (MDC), of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) scale for adults with asthma.MethodsAdults with asthma answered the LCADL scale which was performed twice by the same rater. Spirometry, 6-min walk test (6MWT), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, Asthma Quality of Life questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT), and Glittre-ADL test were assessed. For statistical analyses, Spearman correlation, Wilcoxon test, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Cronbach's alpha coefficient, SEM, MDC were performed.ResultsSeventy participants were included (30% men, 44 & PLUSMN; 15 years old, BMI 27[23-31]kg/m(2), FEV1 80 & PLUSMN; 17%predicted). For convergent validity, the LCADL scale was moderately correlated with SGRQ, AQLQ, and Glittre-ADL (r = 0.57, -0.46, and 0.41 respectively; p < 0.0001). The LCADL scale correlated weakly with the mMRC scale, ACT, and spirometry measures (-0.23< 0.39; p < 0.001). Weak to strong correlations between the domains of the LCADL scale and the domains of the SGRQ were observed (0.26< 0.73; p < 0.001). There was no difference between the test-retest of the scale (p = 0.65) and reliability analysis shows an ICC3 of 0.71, a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.87, an SEM of 6.23 points, and an MDC of 17.27 points.ConclusionThe LCADL scale is valid and reliable for assessing dyspnea during ADL in adults with asthma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available