4.6 Article

Smoke suppressant and fire-retardant polyurethane-polyisocyanurate (PIR) foam

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.54372

Keywords

fire-retardant; polyisocyanurate; polyurethane foam; smoke suppressant; zinc borate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, combinations of phosphorous-containing fire retardants were used as additives to produce non-toxic smoke suppressant and fire-retardant PIR foams. Different combinations of combustion modifiers decreased the flame height and smoke density of PIR foam. The best combinations included zinc borate with triethyl phosphate, or zinc borate with triethyl phosphate and oligomeric triethyl phosphate, which reduced the burning and smoke formation rate of PIR foam. These findings have practical implications for producing fire-retardant PIR foam in the industry.
In this study, the combinations of phosphorous-containing fire retardants such as triethyl phosphate, oligomeric triethyl phosphate, diethyl ethyl phosphonate, diethyl hydroxymethyl phosphonate, ammonium polyphosphate, and smoke suppressant zinc borate were used as additives in order to produce non-toxic smoke suppressant and fire-retardant rigid polyurethane-polyisocyanurate (PIR) foams. Flame height and smoke density of polyurethane-polyisocyanurate foam decreased by incorporating different combinations of combustion modifiers in PIR formulations. The smoke suppressant was zinc borate. The combination of zinc borate with triethyl phosphate, oligomeric triethyl phosphate, and diethyl hydroxymethyl phosphonate resulted in a good synergy. The cone calorimeter analysis showed that the best combinations were zinc borate (10.1%) and triethyl phosphate (13.7%), or zinc borate (10.1%), triethyl phosphate (6.9%), and oligomeric triethyl phosphate (7%) and they decreased the burning and smoke formation rate of PIR foam. These combinations may be applied to produce fire-retardant PIR foam in the industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available