4.3 Article

Development of a prediction model for target positioning by using diaphragm waveforms extracted from CBCT projection images

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14112

Keywords

Amsterdam Shroud; four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography; prediction accuracy; real-time tumor tracking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to develop a prediction model for target positioning using diaphragm waveforms extracted from CBCT projection images. Four different regression-based PMs were trained and compared, and the results showed that PM(AS-4D-CBCT) outperformed PM4D-CBCT, proving the efficacy of the AS signal-based correction.
PurposeTo develop a prediction model (PM) for target positioning using diaphragm waveforms extracted from CBCT projection images. MethodsNineteen patients with lung cancer underwent orthogonal rotational kV x-ray imaging lasting 70 s. IR markers placed on their abdominal surfaces and an implanted gold marker located nearest to the tumor were considered as external surrogates and the target, respectively. Four different types of regression-based PM were trained using surrogate motions and target positions for the first 60 s, as follows: Scenario A: Based on the clinical scenario, 3D target positions extracted from projection images were used as they were (PMCL). Scenario B: The short-arc 4D-CBCT waveform exhibiting eight target positions was obtained by averaging the target positions in Scenario A. The waveform was repeated for 60 s (W4D-CBCT) by adapting to the respiratory phase of the external surrogate. W4D-CBCT was used as the target positions (PM4D-CBCT). Scenario C: The Amsterdam Shroud (AS) signal, which depicted the diaphragm motion in the superior-inferior direction was extracted from the orthogonal projection images. The amplitude and phase of W4D-CBCT were corrected based on the AS signal. The AS-corrected W4D-CBCT was used as the target positions (PMAS-4D-CBCT). Scenario D: The AS signal was extracted from single projection images. Other processes were the same as in Scenario C. The prediction errors were calculated for the remaining 10 s. ResultsThe 3D prediction error within 3 mm was 77.3% for PM4D-CBCT, which was 12.8% lower than that for PMCL. Using the diaphragm waveforms, the percentage of errors within 3 mm improved by approximately 7% to 84.0%-85.3% for PMAS-4D-CBCT in Scenarios C and D, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between the prediction errors of PM4D-CBCT and PMAS-4D-CBCT. ConclusionPM(AS-4D-CBCT) outperformed PM4D-CBCT, proving the efficacy of the AS signal-based correction. PMAS-4D-CBCT would make it possible to predict target positions from 4D-CBCT images without gold markers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available