4.5 Review

Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease: An Anatomic-Genetic Framework for Treatment Development

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages 53-68

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-221247

Keywords

Agitation; Alzheimer's disease; apathy; behavior; dementia; depression; genetics; neuroimaging; neuropsychiatric

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the neurobiological mechanisms of neuropsychiatric symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (NPS-AD), including depression, psychosis, and agitation. The authors found that mechanisms involving monoaminergic biosynthesis and function are likely key elements of NPS-AD, but the lack of effectiveness of current treatments may be due to contributions from additional mechanisms.
Background: Despite the burden on patients and caregivers, there are no approved therapies for the neuropsychiatric symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (NPS-AD). This is likely due to an incomplete understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Objective: To review the neurobiological mechanisms of NPS-AD, including depression, psychosis, and agitation. Methods: Understanding that genetic encoding gives rise to the function of neural circuits specific to behavior, we review the genetics and neuroimaging literature to better understand the biological underpinnings of depression, psychosis, and agitation. Results: We found that mechanisms involving monoaminergic biosynthesis and function are likely key elements of NPS-AD and while current treatment approaches are in line with this, the lack of effectiveness may be due to contributions from additional mechanisms including neurodegenerative, vascular, inflammatory, and immunologic pathways. Conclusion: Within an anatomic-genetic framework, development of novel effective biological targets may engage targets within these pathways but will require a better understanding of the heterogeneity in NPS-AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available