4.7 Article

Supervised machine learning-based multi-class phase prediction in high-entropy alloys using robust databases

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 962, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171224

Keywords

Phase prediction; High entropy alloys; Machine Learning; Intermetallics prediction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the phase prediction capability of high entropy alloys using four supervised machine learning models K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Multinomial Regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Random Forest. The study addressed the challenge of predicting multicomponent alloys by considering the overlapping of multicategorical stability parameters. Eight prediction classes were used. The results showed that with the right database, data treatment, and training, satisfactory prediction indicators can be obtained using traditional machine learning predictions based on four prediction classes.
This work evaluated the phase prediction capability of high entropy alloys using four supervised machine learning models K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Multinomial Regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Random Forest. The study addresses the challenge of predicting multicomponent alloys by considering the overlapping of multicategorical stability parameters. Eight prediction classes (FCC, BCC, FCC+BCC, FCC+Im, BCC+Im, FCC+BCC+Im, Im and AM) were used. Finally, the predicted results were compared with those of two new alloys fabricated by induction melting in a controlled atmosphere using X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results indicate that with a robust database, appropriate data treatment, and training, satisfactory and competitive prediction indicators can be obtained with traditional machine learning predictions based on four prediction classes: Solid Solution (SS), Solid Solution with Intermetallic (SS+Im), intermetallic (Im), and amorphous (AM). The best predictive model obtained from the four evaluated models was Random Forest, with an accuracy of 72.8% and ROC AUC of 93.1%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available