4.7 Article

Structural heterogeneity, β relaxation and magnetic properties of Fe-Zr-B amorphous alloys with Si and Cu additions

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 960, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171059

Keywords

Amorphous alloys; Structural heterogeneity; B relaxation; Magnetic properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the structure and magnetic properties of Fe-based amorphous alloys with different Si and Cu contents. It was found that the addition of Si increased structural heterogeneity and B relaxation, while the addition of Cu weakened them. Moreover, the increase of liquid-like regions led to a decrease in saturation magnetic flux density and an increase in coercivity.
Despite numerous studies on B relaxation of amorphous alloys, the relationship between structural het-erogeneity and B relaxation and the effect on magnetic properties of Fe-based amorphous alloys is still unknow. In this work, the structure and magnetic properties of Fe84-xZr6B10Mx (M = Si, Cu; x = 0, 0.6, 1 at%) amorphous alloys were investigated. With the increase of Si content, the negative value of average chemical affinity ( increment Hchem) of the alloys is increased, leading to the synergetic enhancement in structural hetero-geneity and B relaxation. In addition to this, the increase of liquid-like regions (LLRs) reduces saturation magnetic flux density (Bs) and increases coercivity (Hc). However, the addition of Cu element decreases the negative value of increment Hchem of the alloys, resulting in weakening of structural heterogeneity and B relaxation synergetically. The reduction of LLRs has resulted in increase in Bs. Moreover, Fe-Cu atom pairs with positive enthalpy of mixing increases the local density of quasi dislocation dipoles (QDDs), resulting in the increase of Hc.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available