4.7 Review

Mental health and unemployment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to improve depression and anxiety outcomes

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 335, Issue -, Pages 450-472

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.05.027

Keywords

Unemployment; Depression; Anxiety; Intervention; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unemployment is strongly associated with depression and anxiety. This review analyzed controlled intervention trials aimed at improving mental health outcomes during unemployment. Both prevention and treatment interventions were effective, with treatment interventions showing larger effects. Cognitive Therapy/CBT and work-related interventions had the most robust evidence base.
Background: Unemployment is associated with substantially greater depression and anxiety, constituting a considerable public health concern. The current review provides the most comprehensive synthesis to date, and first meta-analysis, of controlled intervention trials aimed at improving depression and anxiety outcomes during unemployment.Methods: Searches were conducted within PsycInfo, Cochrane Central, PubMed and Embase from their inception to September 2022. Included studies conducted controlled trials of interventions focused on improving mental health within unemployed samples, and reported on validated measures of depression, anxiety, or distress (mixed depression and anxiety). Narrative syntheses and random effects meta-analyses were conducted among pre- vention-and treatment-level interventions for each outcome.Results: A total of 39 articles reporting on 33 studies were included for review (sample sizes ranging from 21 to 1801). Both prevention and treatment interventions tended to be effective overall, with treatment interventions producing larger effect sizes than prevention interventions. The clearest evidence for particular intervention approaches emerged for prevention-level Cognitive Therapy/CBT, followed by prevention-level work-related interventions, although neither produced entirely consistent effects.Limitations: Risk of bias was generally high across studies. Low numbers of studies within subgroups precluded any comparisons between long-term and short-term unemployment, limited comparisons among treatment studies, and reduced the power of meta-analyses.Conclusions: Both prevention-and treatment-level mental health-focused interventions have merit for reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression among those experiencing unemployment. Cognitive Therapy/CBT and work-related interventions hold the most robust evidence base, which can inform both prevention and treatment strategies implemented by clinicians, employment services providers, and governments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available