4.5 Article

Ionic conductivity of the molten systems (LiF-CaF2)eut-NdF3, (LiF-NaF)eut-NdF3, (NaF-CaF2)eut-NdF3 and (LiF-MgF2)eut-NdF3

Journal

IONICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-023-05232-3

Keywords

Electrical/ionic conductivity; Molten salts electrolysis; Rare earth elements (REEs); Neodymium; Molten salt reactor; Electrometallurgy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental measurements were conducted to investigate the relationship between electrical conductivity and temperature as well as NdF3 concentration for four molten systems. The results showed that the conductivity of all systems increased with higher temperatures and lower NdF3 concentrations.
Experimental measurements were made to assess the electrical conductivity as a function of temperature and NdF3 concentration (0-20 mol %) of molten systems of (LiF-CaF2)(eut)-NdF3, (LiF-NaF)(eut)-NdF3, (NaF-CaF2)(eut)-NdF(3 )and (LiF-MgF2)(eut)-NdF3. The experiment used an altering current impedance spectroscopy technique with a platinum-rhodium electrode positioned in a pyrolytic BN tube and graphite a crucible/counter electrode. The conductivity of all systems under study increased with rising temperatures and decreasing NdF3 concentrations. The Arrhenius equation and linear regression have both been used to describe the experimental data. The results of the ionic conductivity for the temperature 850 degrees C and NdF3 concentrations 0, 10 and 15 mol %, respectively, can be compared as follows: the conductivity of the molten system of (LiF-CaF2)(eut)-NdF(3 )was determined to be 6.10, 5.95 and 5.10 S.cm(-1), the results for the system (LiF-NaF)(eut)-NdF3 were 6.16, 5.56 and 4.13 S.cm(-1), the results for the system (NaF-CaF2)(eut)-NdF3 were 3.78, 3.56 and 2.32 S.cm(-1), and finally, the results for the system (LiF-MgF2)(eut)-NdF3 were determined to be for the same temperature as 5.35, 4.79 and 4.14 S.cm(-1), respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available