4.7 Article

Synthesis of zeolite/hydrous lanthanum oxide composite from coal fly ash for efficient phosphate removal from lake water

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages 226-234

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.10.028

Keywords

Zeolite; Lanthanum; Phosphate; Lake; Alum

Funding

  1. National Key Project for Water Pollution Control [2012ZX07105002-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the use of coal fly ash as a raw material for the production of a zeolite/hydrous lanthanum oxide hybrid material (ZHLO) and as a means of controlling internal phosphorus loading in lakes. We found that the use of ZHLO, as a method for capturing phosphate from five lake water samples, was considerably more efficient than the existing alum-treatment method. There was some variability in the performance of the ZHLO-method in different lake waters but we noted that, within the La/P molar ratio range of between 2:1 and 4:1, we were able to attain an almost-complete removal of phosphate. Correlation analysis indicated that high alkalinity reduced the performance of phosphate binding. Phosphate adsorption by ZHLO was found to decrease with increasing pH. The phosphate adsorbed at acidic pH levels was partly released with increasing pH, while phosphate that was in equilibrium solution at high pH was adsorbed when the pH declined. The extent of reversibility when using the ZHLO method was much lower than that observed when using the alum treatment method. FTIR measurements showed that the monodentate surface species of La-OPO3 was formed via a ligand exchange mechanism. Moreover, ZHLO could also function as a means of removing cationic pollutants. This has important implications in terms of preventing the release of toxic substances (such as manganese and ammonium) from sediments in eutrophic lakes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available