4.7 Article

Improvement of catalytic activity over Cu-Fe modified Al-rich Beta catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 236, Issue -, Pages 211-217

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.08.042

Keywords

Al-rich Beta; Cu-Fe-Beta; NH3-SCR; Synergistic effect; Sulfur resistance

Funding

  1. INCOE (International Network of Centers of Excellence) project
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21373035, 21373037, 21577013]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT13YQ107, DUT14RC(3)073, DUT16ZD224]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Copper and iron bimetal modified Al-rich Beta zeolites from template-free synthesis were prepared for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOX with NH3 in exhaust gas streams. Comparing to the Cu-based and Fe-based mono-component Beta catalysts, Cu(3.0)-Fe(1.3)-Beta bi-component catalyst shows better low-temperature activity and wider reaction-temperature window. Over 80% of NO conversion can be achieved at the temperature region of 125-500 degrees C. Due to the synergistic effect of copper and iron evidenced by XRD, UV-Vis-NIR, EPR and XPS measurements, the dispersion state of active components as well as the ratio of Cu2+/Cu+ and Fe3+/Fe2+ were improved over Cu(3.0)-Fe(1.3)-Beta. Isolated Cu2+ and Fe3+ ions which located at the exchange sites could be the active species at the low-temperature region, while FeOX cluster species may be more important to the high-temperature activity. During the test of sulfur resistance, Fe-containing samples including Cu(3.0)-Fe(1.3)-Beta and Fe(2.7)-Beta-4 present better performance compared to Cu(4.1)-Beta-4. Deactivation of Cu-based catalyst is attributed to the easier deposition of sulfates over the surface according to the results of TGA coupled with TPD experiments. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available