4.7 Article

Staphylococcal Enterotoxin C2 Mutant-Induced Antitumor Immune Response Is Controlled by CDC42/MLC2-Mediated Tumor Cell Stiffness

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411796

Keywords

staphylococcal enterotoxin C2; cell softness; ovarian cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals that cell stiffness is a resistance factor to cytotoxic T cell-induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer, and altering cancer cell stiffness can enhance the antitumor effect of superantigen ST-4.
As a biological macromolecule, the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin C2 (SEC2) is one of the most potent known T-cell activators, and it induces massive cytotoxic granule production. With this property, SEC2 and its mutants are widely regarded as immunomodulating agents for cancer therapy. In a previous study, we constructed an MHC-II-independent mutant of SEC2, named ST-4, which exhibits enhanced immunocyte stimulation and antitumor activity. However, tumor cells have different degrees of sensitivity to SEC2/ST-4. The mechanisms of immune resistance to SEs in cancer cells have not been investigated. Herein, we show that ST-4 could activate more powerful human lymphocyte granule-based cytotoxicity than SEC2. The results of RNA-seq and atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis showed that, compared with SKOV3 cells, the softer ES-2 cells could escape from SEC2/ST-4-induced cytotoxic T-cell-mediated apoptosis by regulating cell softness through the CDC42/MLC2 pathway. Conversely, after enhancing the stiffness of cancer cells by a nonmuscle myosin-II-specific inhibitor, SEC2/ST-4 exhibited a significant antitumor effect against ES-2 cells by promoting perforin-dependent apoptosis and the S-phase arrest. Taken together, these data suggest that cell stiffness could be a key factor of resistance to SEs in ovarian cancer, and our findings may provide new insight for SE-based tumor immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available